How can nature conservation compensation be realized without having to make way for agricultural land? And what contribution can compensation make to making the agricultural landscape more natural and diverse?
In Germany, agricultural land is constantly being used for construction work, but is also required for the subsequent nature conservation compensation. This often results in a "double" loss of land for agricultural production, which is needed for sustainable and regional food production. It also increases the already existing pressure on the remaining agricultural land to achieve the highest possible yields, i.e. to cultivate the land as intensively as possible. This pressure is the reason why our agricultural landscape is currently so extensively structured and cleared. Diversified structures and small-scale, varied agricultural areas, which are essential for nature conservation, are a rarity.
One approach to mitigating the conflict between compensation and agricultural land use is production-integrated compensation (PiK). Compensation measures on agricultural land are integrated into production, i.e. further agricultural land use is made possible while at the same time enhancing nature conservation and increasing biodiversity. The agricultural management of the land also ensures the long-term maintenance and implementation of the compensation.
For example, it is possible to achieve a high impact through production-integrated compensation measures with low land requirements that are coordinated with agriculture. The joint search for areas that are less lucrative for agricultural production, but on which a high level of nature conservation enhancement can take place, is also worthwhile. Areas that are no longer in agricultural use, such as former vineyards on steep slopes, can often be used specifically for compensation purposes. In this way, interventions for compensation in the agricultural landscape and also in its valuable arable soils can often be avoided and yet high-quality nature conservation compensation can be carried out on alternative areas.
Guidelines for action on production-integrated compensation
How can PiK measures be used sensibly in the context of nature conservation intervention regulation? What legal framework conditions must be observed? What are the advantages of PiK measures compared to conventional compensation measures? How is the acceptance of agriculture? Answers to these questions are provided in the PiK action guide. In addition, selected PiK measures are presented in a practical way and compared using fact sheets. The guide is aimed at local authorities, specialist planners and farmers.
Search area for areas suitable for PiK in the Stuttgart region
The web application shows the areas in the Stuttgart region that are suitable for production-integrated compensation measures from a nature conservation or agricultural perspective. It is a non-binding cartographic representation developed on the basis of regional data and scientific methods: Explanation and quick guide to the PiK search area map for download.
Landscape model agricultural landscape "Structurally rich pantry"
The Stuttgart Region has a wide variety of landscapes. One of these is the agricultural landscape. What currently characterizes this agricultural landscape and what would it look like in an ideal-typical state in the future? The document discusses how compensation measures can contribute to achieving the ideal-typical state.
Further documents for download
- Development of supply curves of nature conservation compensation measures on agricultural land using the example of the Stuttgart region
- Expert-Based Maps as a Regional Planning Tool Supporting Nature Conservation and Production-Integrated Compensation-A German Case Study on Biodiversity Offsets
- Farmers' preferences for nature conservation compensation measures with a focus on eco-accounts according to the German Nature Conservation Act
- Integrated assessment of regional approaches for biodiversity offsetting in urban-rural areas - A future based case study from Germany using arable land as an example